Subject	by nice, I meant it was the only nice part of that Z
Posted by	komplexZ on June 30, 2004 at 8:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	Slightly less torquey than the VG, but nice anyway. posted by Marshall on June 30, 2004 at 01:31 PM
Message	but ill have to search for that thread on VG vs RB. I believe vg gets more torque just based on bigger displacement. “A common question asked is do 2+2 Z's handle better than 2 seaters? The answer, in theory, is yes. The slightly longer wheelbase should provide better high speed stability and controllability when the rear starts to lose traction.”
Follow Ups	My contribution for the yr. rb26 pwrd z32. clean look Sorta - kikbak82 01:21:35 06/30/04 fixed - Playboy 01:35:58 06/30/04 LMAO nice wing!! (n/m) - TTwinZ (CT) 01:43:32 06/30/04 Did you get my e-mail? (n/m) - Z1TRUTH 01:45:49 06/30/04 check yours (n/m) - Playboy 01:49:58 06/30/04 I checked mine and I love you! (n/m) - Z1TRUTH 01:54:45 06/30/04 Whoa...slow down you two. - AbnormallyAspirated 04:50:24 06/30/04 What color are those blue stickers!!! LOL!!! (n/m) - Z1TRUTH 11:23:51 06/30/04 LMAO!!! (n/m) - AbnormallyAspirated 01:12:12 07/01/04 Ricey...but impressive nonetheless. (n/m) - Zenn 01:46:16 06/30/04 I have that head unit.... (n/m) - la300zxtt (TJ) 02:45:17 06/30/04 Jesus... - Malukalu99 03:40:38 06/30/04 Seen it before. Not bad, but some of the rice needs to go. - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 08:33:11 06/30/04 Top 10 ugliest Z's I have ever seen. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 09:03:01 06/30/04 it does have a nice engine (n/m) - komplexZ 09:31:29 06/30/04 Slightly less torquey than the VG, but nice anyway. - Marshall 13:31:25 06/30/04 by nice, I meant it was the only nice part of that Z - komplexZ 20:38:13 06/30/04 if there was a z that could fly it would be that one. (n/m) - Jimiz91 18:35:06 06/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.